<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dead Pixels &#187; Image Stabilization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk/tag/image-stabilization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Canon&#8217;s new 70-200mm lens with new Image Stabilization Technology! Why?</title>
		<link>http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk/2010/01/canons-new-70-200mm-lens-with-new-image-stabilization-technology-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk/2010/01/canons-new-70-200mm-lens-with-new-image-stabilization-technology-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[70-200mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Considerations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f/2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk/2010/01/canons-new-70-200mm-lens-with-new-image-stabilization-technology-why/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon have improved their image stabilization (IS) system in one of their latest lenses:
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
 
This lens offers a “4 stop Image Stabilizer”, meaning that you can increase the time that the shutter is open by 4 stops before you’d start to see camera shake due to the camera being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon have improved their image stabilization (IS) system in one of their latest lenses:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/EF_Lenses/Zoom_Lenses/EF_70-200mm_f_f2.8L_IS_II_USM/index.asp">Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM</a></p>
<p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 10px 30px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="EF_70-200mm_f2.8_L_IS_II_USM_w200_tcm14-701541[1]" border="0" alt="EF_70-200mm_f2.8_L_IS_II_USM_w200_tcm14-701541[1]" align="right" src="http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Canonsnew70200mmlenswithnewImageStabiliz_12506/EF_70200mm_f2.8_L_IS_II_USM_w200_tcm147015411.jpg" width="216" height="502" /> </p>
<p>This lens offers a “4 stop Image Stabilizer”, meaning that you can increase the time that the shutter is open by 4 stops before you’d start to see camera shake due to the camera being held in your hand.</p>
<p>You can get this great feature for just £1000 more that the same lens with the standard IS (currently priced at around £1300), and £1200ish more than the same lens without any stabilizations.</p>
<p>“Great” you might shout, but wait… lets think about what this lens might be used for…</p>
<p>Firstly, it’s a zoom lens, up to 200mm, so you’ll probably be shooting something that’s a decent distance away: birds, cars, sport, your next victim (depending on your hobbies), and all of these subjects are likely to be moving fairly quickly.</p>
<p>Generally the lens wouldn’t be used for more stationary objects such as landscapes or buildings.</p>
<p>Which makes me wonder:</p>
<p><strong>Is leaving the shutter open longer a good thing for this lens?</strong></p>
<p>In order to get a crisp image of these subjects, ideally you’d have a fast shutter speed to freeze any motion and get a sharp, well defined image!</p>
<p>Image stabilization version 2 would be perfect on a wide angle or kit lens, allowing you to take great landscapes or architecture shots where the subject doesn’t move, so why bring it out on this zoom lens?</p>
<p>So, dear Canon, please develop “Subject Stabilization” technology, allowing the photographer to freeze their subject motionless until the photo has been taken.   <br />If only because football matches would be much more humorous.</p>
<p>It seems that you’re paying a lot more for a feature that would be rarely used on this lens.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts, comment away with your “well actually…”’s….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dead-pixels.co.uk/2010/01/canons-new-70-200mm-lens-with-new-image-stabilization-technology-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
